3 ms·
And by "community" they mean business model.
by throwaway48476 2y ago
And by "community" they mean business model.
- verdverm 2y agoWhere and how do the content creators fit into this?
- throwaway48476 2y agoMost creators only have a small percentage of revenue from ads. A lot of the creators I like are demonetized anyways. Superchats and paid comments are way more lucrative than ads. Google is in the malvertising business. Creators are not.
- AuthConnectFail 2y agothis is just not true, even the huge creators mention that it's usually 30-50% of their revenue.
- throwaway48476 2y agoThis is likely skewed by the creators I follow. I imagine there's a lot of youtube poop child audience content that's near 100% ad revenue. Personally speaking, if low quality "creators" suffer I won't feel bad.
- karaterobot 2y agoPresumably many would choose to block Invidious, and many would not. It sounds like none of them get a choice in the matter, which is why it's not crazy to question whether community is used as a euphemism in this case.
- verdverm 2y ago> Presumably many would choose to block Invidious, and many would not. Is this something a creator can do on their own today? How many of them are aware of Invidious?
- karaterobot 2y agoNegative, and unknown.
- netsharc 2y agoGotta love that newspeak!
- orthecreedence 2y ago"Community of shareholders"
- soraminazuki 2y agoGoogle pulling the rug on the open web after years of benefitting from it is a shitty move. Then to inject corporate propaganda into alternative frontends after making the default experience miserable, even not considering the ads, is shittier still.