> the distinction does matter because policy discussion should be around facts rather than vibes. You're just suggesting we use different vibes. There's nothi

> the distinction does matter because policy discussion should be around facts rather than vibes. You're just suggesting we use different vibes. There's nothing more factual about a random opinion survey or report from an economic research organization with an agenda than anything else. Mainstream economics IS all vibes at this point. Not sure how someone could miss it.