I am in that group you mentioned and this is not even a bad take. They might have been trying to imply ROS but that's also a very much not a well-targeted criti

I am in that group you mentioned and this is not even a bad take. They might have been trying to imply ROS but that's also a very much not a well-targeted criticism either. Robotics is not bunch of humanoids moving their attached manipulators. Next; this article appears in IEEE spectrum not Quanta. I want higher quality from IEEE as was the case for decades and it is not a pop science avenue. Good pop science is hard and other places do it much better. This is just a mediocre blog article found somehow its way into IEEE which is very concerning about the quality of IEEE spectrum.