Prove it. The open letter this article is based on still cites, "existential risk." Define what AGI is. Show us evidence the technology is on track to impleme

Prove it. The open letter this article is based on still cites, "existential risk." Define what AGI is. Show us evidence the technology is on track to implement it. This whole "AI safety" scene is becoming a circus for conspiracy theories and speculation. As far as I can tell we're reaching the point of diminishing returns in training LLMs... which is already rather destructive. What's telling is that we don't see similar "safety" committees there trying to protect water in distressed ecosystems, regulate building/zoning of data-centres, energy usage; protecting workers used in alignment and training; protecting workers displaced by the technology and poor policies, etc.