6 ms·
> to breaking the turing test (2020+) You mean 1967, right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA > However, many early user
by wizzwizz4 2y ago
> to breaking the turing test (2020+)
You mean 1967, right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA
> However, many early users were convinced of ELIZA's intelligence and understanding, despite Weizenbaum's insistence to the contrary.
- ben_w 2y ago"Does X look like Y" is always a continum. In test environments, players are judged human with these rates: * Real humans 66% * GPT-4: 49.7% * ELIZA: 22% * GPT-3.5: 20% https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.20216 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.20216 (I'm rather surprised by ELIZA beating 3.5, as were the researchers). Turing's introduction of the test, was a 70% chance of spotting the AI after 5 minutes.