4 ms·
> Then I checked out the Social Democrats, and they didn't speak out about open source. "Not speaking out" is not against. But being anti-nuclear is clearly a
by rdsubhas 2y ago
> Then I checked out the Social Democrats, and they didn't speak out about open source.
"Not speaking out" is not against. But being anti-nuclear is clearly a stand against.
Any party can't have binary decisions on everything, and that's fine, this means business as usual on an issue by issue basis. But where they _do_ have a binary stand, it matters.
I do agree with the parent comment though, in today's day and age needing huge coal free electrification targets in short timeframes to save the planet, being explicitly anti-nuclear power is a clear red flag, and doubly makes no sense for a digital technological party to have this stand.
- account42 2y ago> and doubly makes no sense for a digital technological party to have this stand I sometimes wonder if these politics taking over fringe parties are deliberate attempts to destroy them. Because yeah it doesn't make sense that they would make that part of their program.