5 ms·
Why not? Shouldn't technological advancements lead to less need for human labor?
by wildrhythms 2y ago
Why not? Shouldn't technological advancements lead to less need for human labor?
- lotsofpulp 2y agoOnly if the expectations for quality of life, and other external factors such as supply of resources to maintain those expectations of quality of life, remain the same. Examples of increases in quality of life include things like living into one’s 80s and 90s using dialysis and heart surgeries and new medicines. Examples of changes in supply of resources include things like energy, labor, and a hospitable natural environment. All of these things are constantly in flux, and automation sometimes outpaces them, and sometimes does not.
- account42 2y agoWhat a weird comment considering that free time is a major component of quality of life.
- lotsofpulp 2y agoI never claimed free time was not a major component of quality of life. The insinuation was that maintaining or increasing some components of quality of life, such as labor and resource intensive healthcare, could come at a cost of other components of quality of life, such as free time (and those gains/costs are not necessarily experienced by the same person).
- Rinzler89 2y agoExactly. Imagine how will your quality of life be if all doctors, teachers, nurses, delivery workers, plumbers, service workers, also worked only 4 days/week. There would be an even worse labor shortage across the entire economy of biblical proportions. It's easy to see how it benefits you when only you're working 4 days/week but the rest of society on which your first world lifestyle depends, keeps working 5 days/week, being at your disposal for the same amount of time, while your enjoying more time off than the rest. Need a doctor? Sorry, you'll have to wait more time now because now all are working 4 days/week. Need to go grocery shopping? Sorry, everything is closed today. Need a plumber? Sorry, most are off today as well. There's no free lunch here. Moving the entire society to 4 days/week would require massive shifts economically and socially.
- account42 2y agoSo why now advocate for 6 or 7 day work week then? Because time off is worth a lot. And going from a 5 day work week to a 4 day work week is a 20% reduction of work days but a whopping 50% increase in weekend days. Meanwhile the number of doctors and plumbers etc. is not a fixed constant but driven by demand. There are plenty of qualified people currently doing useless work or unemployed who could fill those roles with the right incentives.
- Rinzler89 2y ago>Because time off is worth a lot. It is, but someone still has to work to keep society going in those "time off days". Doctors can't treat the same amount of patients in 4 days as in 5. Teachers can't squeeze the curriculum in 4 days. Customer support can't squeeze everyone in 4 days. Etc. So how will you increase the number of doctors and other staff to work in the days the existing staff are off? You can't just magic more workers out of thin air, especially now when we're already in a labor shortage in many fields like healthcare with everyone already working 5 days/week and with fertility declining in the west.