In other words: water is wet. I kinda get the impression, the author of the original articles has little understanding of what they are actually talking about.

In other words: water is wet. I kinda get the impression, the author of the original articles has little understanding of what they are actually talking about. The numbers of concerning extensions they found is rather low, and their claims of concern are very questionable, especially when they bring s** like a "reverse shell" to a local IP as a security-problem. My impression is, they heard about problems, poked around and found things they do not understand and then claim problems. This is just poor rage bait for the alarmist mindset than real meat.