5 ms·
Seems counter-intuitive to have it explain it's not a person from the first-person. I (a person) would have preferred it output like: "This output is from an a
by moritonal 2y ago
Seems counter-intuitive to have it explain it's not a person from the first-person. I (a person) would have preferred it output like:
"This output is from an artificial intelligence"
"This conversation isn't remembered, saved or updates"
"This output is designed to feel like a warm relationship"
See, now it's much more obvious. The problem is that it's blunt, it'd make lines like "this isn't saved" now technically incorrect, and won't be as effective in "connecting" with people, which is what people are so excited for.
- TheCoreh 2y agoCulturally, the first person is not reserved only for human entities, for example the "don't pet me, I'm working" vests on service dogs, or the juvenile prank of writing "wash me" on a dirty car. Beyond these examples there's a very long history of mythological and fictional talking creatures, entities and objects all using the first person.