4 ms·
That sounds awesome. But from a scientific point of view, you don't really need spatial resolution for the heartbeat example, though, do you? If you just spent
by taliesinb 14y ago
That sounds awesome.
But from a scientific point of view, you don't really need spatial resolution for the heartbeat example, though, do you? If you just spent the same amount of money on getting high temporal and spectral resolution, surely one could do very cool things with 'just one pixel', so to speak. Especially if you had say 16 different wavelengths, instead of just 3.
- carlob 14y agoFor increased temporal resolution you can just the rolling shutter with off-the-shelf hardware I guess.
- kolinko 14y agoIf the face of a "patient" was tied to his bed, and light wasn't changing, and there was no movement around (i.e. in ideal conditions), then yeah. But in the real world scenarios you want to take a look at more than one pixel, and use the rest of the picture for noise reduction & calibration. That is for heartbeat. But yes, with better spectral resolution you might get some other cool data.