3 ms·

I understand where you are coming from, but I’m not sure I completely agree. Streaming music was popular even before it became legal, so I believe it's largely

by pheggs 2y ago

I understand where you are coming from, but I’m not sure I completely agree. Streaming music was popular even before it became legal, so I believe it's largely driven by people's desire to listen to whatever they want, whenever they want. Regarding AI, it’s true that the current results might not always be the highest quality. However, there is no theoretical limit to AI's capabilities as far as I know. With this many people working to improve it, I would personally be surprised if significant advancements aren’t made. Maybe not just next year though... Ultimately, I guess we will have to wait and see. Who knows, maybe you will be right in the end :)

FabHK 2y ago
> Streaming music was popular even before it became legal Downloading music was popular. You download once, you listen many times. On Napster, it could take hours until a song was downloaded. No way you'd delete it and download again next time you want to listen to it.
surfingdino 2y ago
The number of people working on improving AI is relatively small compared to the number of people reselling OpenAI APIs so I don't expect huge improvements in the next 5-10 years. The real value of AI is in ML, but with human supervision and interpretation of results. GenAI is the worst thing that happened to AI, because its coming rejection will reflect badly on the rest of the advances broadly labelled as AI.