And then hand-waved the problem with "most studies don't matter and are crap anyway". Well, then perhaps your field doesn't matter in aggregate? He has this p

And then hand-waved the problem with "most studies don't matter and are crap anyway". Well, then perhaps your field doesn't matter in aggregate? He has this premise that "the field is disparate findings anyway" so even if most are shot down, doesn't matter, but even in that case, seems like a waste and very low signal vs noise ratio to keep it up...