4 ms·
It's surprising that the main thrust of this is surprising. Do biologists not tend to think about electromagnetic force and it's implications?
by danielmarkbruce 2y ago
It's surprising that the main thrust of this is surprising. Do biologists not tend to think about electromagnetic force and it's implications?
- newzisforsukas 2y agoThey do but that doesn't lend to a hype topic for writing poorly about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developmental_bioelectricity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developmental_bioelectricity
- olddustytrail 2y ago[flagged]
- spacetimeuser5 2y agoWhen in 18xx FDA or its precursor was being formed, its goal was to confine various "bioelectrical woo" present in medicine and biology at that time. And back then there was Rife's microscope, for example, which was able to accurately image living cells. Yet no-one tried to account for the cumulative damage/adverse effects done by FDA approved treatments in comparison with a potential or actual damage done by such "woo".
- danielmarkbruce 2y agoInteresting. Thanks for the insight.