4 ms·
I assume that's what c-level people have in their mind: Nothing is accurate and fail-safe 100%. You just have to reach a level where it is good enough most of
by pheggs 2y ago
I assume that's what c-level people have in their mind:
Nothing is accurate and fail-safe 100%. You just have to reach a level where it is good enough most of the times to make money with it.
Also, human brains are neural networks too, so that's where we know what the minimum is which is (theoretically) possible with this kind of technology.
- GOD_Over_Djinn 2y ago[flagged]
- lupusreal 2y agoWhat do you think artificial neural networks were inspired by?
- GOD_Over_Djinn 2y agoI don’t care what they were inspired by, because that’s not what we’re talking about. The comment I replied to said that brains ARE neural networks, in a literal sense. This is a common misconception, but is well known to be just that among people who are actually well-informed on the topic. Just because you don’t understand it doesn’t make it any less true.
- lupusreal 2y agoBrains are networks of neurons, e.g. neural nets. They also contain other structures like blood vessels, etc, but it is completely reasonable to say they are neural networks.
- GOD_Over_Djinn 2y agoSure, that makes a ton of sense. Kind of like how an airplane is a type of bird.
- lupusreal 2y agoAgain, you are confusing neural networks with artificial neural networks. Neural networks are to artificial neural networks as birds are to ornithopters. Why don't you just cut to the chase and bring out the dualism "antennas for the soul" crap already? No sense beating around the bush, your username has me sure it's coming eventually.
- meiraleal 2y agoIronically, a drone is becoming increasingly similar to a type of bird. In 100 years, when they might be made of organic material, I would guess it will be normal to call them birds.