3 ms·
Unfortunately, no, because the existence of LLMs that can automatically determine code that is suspicious will be offset by the existence of LLMs that can gener
by kibwen 2y ago
Unfortunately, no, because the existence of LLMs that can automatically determine code that is suspicious will be offset by the existence of LLMs that can generate malicious code that bypasses the detection abilities of the aforementioned LLMs.
- CrazyStat 2y agoGenerative Adversarial LLMs, let’s go!
- protosam 2y agoPerhaps we could just call these ALLMs (Adversarial Large Language Models). You’re already dropping the N in GAN, I see no need for the G. As an end result I think someone clever could make a LLaMA pun for the name of a LLaMA based ALLM.