In almost every respect I have a slight preference for the intel way (nasm dialect), but could live with the at&t one. But it's just ridiculous how mov eax

In almost every respect I have a slight preference for the intel way (nasm dialect), but could live with the at&t one. But it's just ridiculous how mov eax, [edi + 8*ebx + 3] is written as mov 3(%edi,%ebx,8), %eax