3 ms·
"Of course, there’s nothing wrong with those things, and ephemeral delight might be good enough for some people, but I’m usually looking for something more out
by mb_72 14y ago
"Of course, there’s nothing wrong with those things, and ephemeral delight might be good enough for some people, but I’m usually looking for something more out of my reading (in fact, I don’t read fiction at all any more)."
I find this comment slightly arrogant and condescending. By choosing not to read fiction the author deprives himself of experiencing not only "ephemeral delight", but also removes the possibility of deriving insight from many inspiring and thought-provoking works.
Not all raw 'brain food' needs come from non-fiction. This is one reason I like science-fiction - the better works combine fantasy with reality, and bridge the dream / conscious worlds in a way that very readily lends itself to new thoughts and ideas.
In addition, the mental escape provided by fiction can be soothing and healing to the pattern and structure-obsessed mind I - and likely number of HN people - have. Sci-fi and fantasy books are, for me, as alcohol or drugs are for others.
- ojbyrne 14y agoWhen I hear someone say "I don't read fiction" I almost always think to myself, "You don't have any imagination."
- fotbr 14y agoOften it's the opposite - they have enough imagination to not need someone else to imagine for them. I rarely read fiction simply because I don't have the time to. I've got too many hobbies that I enjoy, and there's always something about them that I can learn about them, so my reading is almost always hobby related.
- larrys 14y ago""I don't read fiction" I almost always think to myself, "You don't have any imagination."" Why? I don't read fiction and I have plenty of imagination. I watch movies and TV. That's not reading but it is fiction. Is that why I have imagination? (I don't know..) You read fiction because you enjoy it. That's separate from having imagination.