3 ms·
Which means that the fix is to change the media not the metrics. That's the gist of the argument - if your improvements of "reality" aren't making people happie
by izacus 2y ago
Which means that the fix is to change the media not the metrics. That's the gist of the argument - if your improvements of "reality" aren't making people happier, you're changing the wrong metric. In this case you need to change the media, not crime stats.
- estebank 2y agoChanging the underlying reality without improving the perception leads to a political disconnect. Improving the perception without improving the underlying reality just makes people happier, but not better off. You have to do both if your objective is to improve people's lifes.
- izacus 2y agoIndeed, which is why I ended up my original post with "by itself". Changing the state is a necessary, but not sufficient action.
- eszed 2y agoI agree. So, which one do you prioritize? Currently, it seems to me as if people's (mis)perceptions are leading them to vote against policies that will make them better off, so we need to correct perceptions first.