> But I wouldn't dismiss it because of it, as the "million bots that are out there" are hand-coded to exploit specific vulnerabilities I would absolutely dismi

> But I wouldn't dismiss it because of it, as the "million bots that are out there" are hand-coded to exploit specific vulnerabilities I would absolutely dismiss it if it's literally just an LLM sitting on top of bots and because there is an LLM involved now it's suddenly an agent. What is the LLM doing here that makes it more potent than existing techniques? > However, these agents still perform poorly on real-world vulnerabilities that are unknown to the agent ahead of time (zero-day vulnerabilities). This quote is the tell This article seems like a prime example of the perverse incentives that exist in academia.