3 ms·
No problem for those people to suffer then
by chomskyole 2y ago
No problem for those people to suffer then
- coldtea 2y agoI think the parent is more concerned about whether the poor company's stock might be in trouble...
- Rinzler89 2y agoHe never said that, he just pointed out a statistic. You choose to assume that. Please top braking HN rules by assuming bad faith. HN rules state: "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."
- ruszki 2y agoOP was dismissive.
- chomskyole 2y ago> Microsoft lays off 1,500 workers This is a heading of interest since we all are concerned about being laid off. > That's less than 1% of their workforce Focuses on how the lay offs look from the perspective of the company. > No problem for those people to suffer then Points out that looking at it from the company focus omits the negative impacts lay offs have on on individuals I mean we are having a conversation here and not just listing factlets, right? So do you really see any bad faith in the above?
- Proven 2y ago[dead]