3 ms·
If the process by which one becomes a beneficiary is swiss cheese, that does matter. That changes the strength of the very word beneficiary in the statement "b
by Brian_K_White 2y ago
If the process by which one becomes a beneficiary is swiss cheese, that does matter.
That changes the strength of the very word beneficiary in the statement "beneficiary until proven otherwise". It's now only "maybe beneficiary until proven otherwise."
In other words, arguable, requiring to be determined.
You're not the thing until proven otherwise, the thing has to be proven in the first place now.
- tossandthrow 2y agoBeneficiary until proven otherwise. That sounds precise. If you are in poor belief that you really are not the beneficiary, I would take care spending the money! That is how it always has been. The tax agency can come back 5 years later and ammend You tax filling. The same here. You announce who the beneficiary is (the ex girlfriend), someone challenges that, but that does not change the beneficiary until the decision has been made. I don't really see other ways it could work? > You're not the thing until proven otherwise, the thing has to be proven in the first place now. You misunderstand. You are the thing until proven otherwise.
- Brian_K_White 2y ago"You misunderstand. You are the thing until proven otherwise." Not if the process by which you become the the thing is swiss cheese. In that case you are nothing but a potential. A potential thing is not a thing.
- tossandthrow 2y agoI should declare my taxes Swiss cheese.