> > ...the posts are (usually) longer form articles instead of short bits. > If I want superficial takes, I can get more than my fill of them IRL I'm confused

> > ...the posts are (usually) longer form articles instead of short bits. > If I want superficial takes, I can get more than my fill of them IRL I'm confused, where did this assumption of low-quality come from? Are you thinking of SEO spam articles? which targets mainstream search engines in order to increase ad views and revenue? Those type of websites are on a different spectrum and usually RSS-hostile to begin with. Anyway, RSS is a standard, it's not limited (or related) to "superficial takes" you can use it to follow your favorite short-form content too.