3 ms·
> ...the posts are (usually) longer form articles instead of short bits. If I want superficial takes, I can get more than my fill of them IRL. I enjoy the inte
by 082349872349872 2y ago
> ...the posts are (usually) longer form articles instead of short bits.
If I want superficial takes, I can get more than my fill of them IRL. I enjoy the internet precisely because it allows me to spend a few minutes reading what someone invested a few hours in writing (and had maybe even been thinking about for a few days beforehand?).
- _xivi 2y ago> > ...the posts are (usually) longer form articles instead of short bits. > If I want superficial takes, I can get more than my fill of them IRL I'm confused, where did this assumption of low-quality come from? Are you thinking of SEO spam articles? which targets mainstream search engines in order to increase ad views and revenue? Those type of websites are on a different spectrum and usually RSS-hostile to begin with. Anyway, RSS is a standard, it's not limited (or related) to "superficial takes" you can use it to follow your favorite short-form content too.
- 082349872349872 2y agoYou're probably confused because we agree: the low-quality stuff doesn't tend to wind up in RSS (and if it does, it's easy to drop that feed)
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]