3 ms·
If not, I suspect the OP's point stands. The point that I'm replying to and that I quoted is 'Romans didn't write about women'. I don't see how it stands when
by pvg 2y ago
If not, I suspect the OP's point stands.
The point that I'm replying to and that I quoted is 'Romans didn't write about women'. I don't see how it stands when you can open a Roman chronicler and right away he's writing about women.
The only woman I could think of
I mean, you have 'suspect' and 'think of', I've got a link to a big pile of Roman writing. It's not hard to check if women are in fact represented in Roman writing.