3 ms·
You’re right of course, which is why Fuji sells both Provia and Velvia. However the slide is still the image. It’s not a perfect reproduction of the scene in fr
by armadsen 2y ago
You’re right of course, which is why Fuji sells both Provia and Velvia. However the slide is still the image. It’s not a perfect reproduction of the scene in front of the lens, but there’s no subjective choices to be made during printing and/or scanning to invert it. Stick it in front of a light and you can see the image with the naked eye just as it exists on the film. I think that’s what OP was getting at.
- npteljes 2y ago>there’s no subjective choices to be made during printing and/or scanning Same could be said about a simple smartphone photo, but they hardly hold the same respect. I personally get the same feeling, but as hard as I try to define where the "honest analog" ends and the "manipulated uninteresting lies" begins, the more blurry it becomes. At the end of the day, there is no honest representation at all, as many people manipulated the analogue photos as well.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]