3 ms·
> They would permaban everything even slightly unconformable and be fine. There is no way that scales IMO.
by 2OEH8eoCRo0 2y ago
> They would permaban everything even slightly unconformable and be fine.
There is no way that scales IMO.
- AlbertCory 2y agoIs that supposed to be the killer argument? Who cares if giant companies can't "scale" any more?
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 2y agoI mean there is no way they can whack-a-mole every problematic user post. Even if they could- users wouldn't stand for it and would look for alternatives. If they started losing users to this they'd also work on a solution or new laws. I don't think a post-section 230 web is pessimistic but that's my opinion. We shall see I suppose.
- AlbertCory 2y agoI say, "bring it on." The current web is an open sewer and something would evolve that would probably be better. It could hardly be any worse. If that turns out not to be the case, we could always reinstate 230.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 2y agoYes, I agree.