3 ms·
Awful summary video, in my opinion. Takes 5 minutes to get to the new discovery, then spends 3 minutes repeatedly claiming that we don’t have any explanations f
by chairhairair 2y ago
Awful summary video, in my opinion. Takes 5 minutes to get to the new discovery, then spends 3 minutes repeatedly claiming that we don’t have any explanations for the wide range of genome sizes, then 2 mins of Patreon credits to get over the 10 minute mark. There might be 30 seconds of actual content in this video.
I’d give a highschooler a bad grad on this, why do so many people give this guy money to make low quality content like this?
He could have just picked any section of this Wikipedia page and read it verbatim and he would have transmitted more information: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome_size https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome_size
- p1esk 2y agoI found that video pretty interesting.
- 1234554321a 2y agoBad channels which’ve accumulated views and subscribers getting recommended by the youtube algorithm. Hence why he has a filler segment to get the video to 10 minutes. That’s just how youtube works nowadays.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]