2 ms·
This is outrage-bait, and more importantly, generated by an LLM so everyone can confidently assume it's false. This is not intellectually gratifying or evidence
by talldayo 2y ago
This is outrage-bait, and more importantly, generated by an LLM so everyone can confidently assume it's false. This is not intellectually gratifying or evidence of a new phenomenon, it is Elon-flavored sensationalism.
- forgot-im-old 2y agoWhich statements do you disagree with? It has a citation for most everything.
- talldayo 2y agoI disagree with the process. You cannot ask an AI anything and expect to get authoritative answers; I'm not going to do your job for you and fact-check an LLM's opinion. You put too much faith in the competence of chatbots and it will make you look like a fool if you claim it "divulges Nuclear War Plans" when it's only stroking your ego and autocompleting what you ask. You're just going to look like a child running everywhere saying "the sky is falling!" when your cited source is some billionaire's vanity project. Not a single reputable person would take you seriously in this scenario, and to preserve my own reputation I won't either.
- georgeg23 2y agoSounds like an ad hominem attack... or ad-machinum?
- talldayo 2y agoAm I wrong? If anyone knows of a chatbot that has never lied before, don't hold your breath; speak up now.