4 ms·
> In my experience generally GraalVM is slower to start, but after a few iterations it can be as fast or faster Probably having to do with the JVM being optimi
by indolering 2y ago
> In my experience generally GraalVM is slower to start, but after a few iterations it can be as fast or faster
Probably having to do with the JVM being optimized for long-running server processes.
>the same results can be amplified if you use the JVM instead of AOT (i.e. it's even slower to start, but eventually it can be much faster.)
OpenJ9 has a caching JIT server that (theoretically) would work around this.