4 ms·
You're conflating three separate concepts. There's nothing inherently wrong with quoting the part you're reacting to, and it can be done without resorting to fl
by rickmb 14y ago
You're conflating three separate concepts. There's nothing inherently wrong with quoting the part you're reacting to, and it can be done without resorting to flaming or Fisking.
- KC8ZKF 14y agoYou are correct, but requiring or encouraging quoting promotes arguing trivial points of the article. See USENET circa 1995.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]