> I’m claiming a direct causality You are inferring direct causality based on one event following another. That is the logical fallacy I referred to. > There’

> I’m claiming a direct causality You are inferring direct causality based on one event following another. That is the logical fallacy I referred to. > There’s a clear and massive decline even if you only look at pre-1914 rates. That's not what I see, so I guess we'll just have to disagree.