3 ms·
Im not a physicist. But it doesn't sound that convincing to replace dark matter due to lack of direct evidence, with something even more exotic which also has
by bawolff 2y ago
Im not a physicist.
But it doesn't sound that convincing to replace dark matter due to lack of direct evidence, with something even more exotic which also has no direct evidence
- ItCouldBeWorse 2y agoWhen space expands it produces gravity? Like a groaning ship ripped apart, something snaps, when nothing is produced and becomes a place, producing a small background ripple. Concentric from the big bang outwards, like growth rings, dragging apart lights and things. Its not a valid concept, but its a new idea, something to test, anything is better, then collecting data and watching the model drift away every day like a ghost in the night.
- datavirtue 2y agoIt's like an LLM ate a whole bag of 2:1 gummies.
- simne 2y agoExists at least one example (to be exact there are few, but this one is overwhelming when looking carefully), which could be explained by topological defect - in 2023 made photo of two galaxies, which looking exactly same, but mirrored with invisible mirror. Sure, this could be just coincidence of very similar galaxies, need more observations.
- simne 2y agohttps://www.sciencealert.com/we-may-have-just-found-evidence-of-a-cosmic-string-a-crease-in-the-universe https://www.sciencealert.com/we-may-have-just-found-evidence...