4 ms·
<< "cracking" the implementation of Recal I think you have a point there. Would you accept reverse engineering[1] as a more accurate term instead of cracking?
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
<< "cracking" the implementation of Recal
I think you have a point there. Would you accept reverse engineering[1] as a more accurate term instead of cracking?
<< I have only been somewhat paying attention
We are in the same boat. I saw the thing pop in my feeds in the past weeks. I skimmed it, thought it was a bad idea, but since I don't have a PC that would be affected, mostly ignored it. I think I only pay more attention today, because it is the weekend and somehow my testing is not ready for me..
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_engineering https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_engineering
[2]https://www.wired.com/story/microsoft-windows-recall-privilege-escalation/ https://www.wired.com/story/microsoft-windows-recall-privile...
- sseagull 2y agoAh I see. I guess that came across as criticizing your terminology, but it was more aimed at the general hype around those reverse-engineering articles, which seemed a bit over the top to me :) Either way, I'm holding off on buying one of these PCs until some real-world info comes out (no one really has this capability yet, so it's all largely speculative).