3 ms·
Doesn't Microsoft have a long history (and present) where they just enable privacy invasive "features" after a windows update even though the user has disabled
by lordofgibbons 2y ago
Doesn't Microsoft have a long history (and present) where they just enable privacy invasive "features" after a windows update even though the user has disabled or removed the "feature"?
- 7thaccount 2y agoYeah. You tell everyone you learned your lesson and then just go back and do it anyway a year later.
- lawlessone 2y agoIt must be the year for all this. Bethesda are basically trying again to make paid mods stick with their Fallout 4 update. Softwar never changes.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- ceejayoz 2y agoTwitter used to do this all the time; they'd make the notification email options more granular and opt you in to the three new options that used to make up the one option you already unchecked.
- resource_waste 2y agoYes. Windows is soo low quality. It feels cheap. It feels like you are at a car dealership. Fedora, feels like you are at some futuristic office that has buttons that do multiple steps. I was literally angry last year that it took me so long to learn about up-to-date linux. Canonical's marketing of debian-family linux gave Desktop Linux a bad name.
- giancarlostoro 2y agoYeah, which is why I'm over on Linux now.