3 ms·
It will be re-enabled accidentally by an update anyways.
by cybrox 2y ago
It will be re-enabled accidentally by an update anyways.
- Rinzler89 2y agoPlease stop with these kinds of made up fantasy scenarios. There's no such thing as "accidental enablement" for stuff like this, as if it's a switch every employee at Microsoft has access to, and one of them one day can end up flipping by accident with their elbow and it ends up in production without anyone else noticing. Either they decide to intentionally enable it or not. There are no accidents , when stuff like this needs to go through a committee of people for approval before it makes it into production.
- i_s 2y agoI'm not sure the use of 'accidentally' was sincere. But I like this choice of words in your post in your first version: > unmercenary assumptions
- Tool_of_Society 2y agoYet despite all that I've witnessed accidents still make it in production...
- meowster 2y agoI think OP forgot the quotes around "accidentally". You're right it won't be a true accident; it will be intentional and just called an "accident".
- tetha 2y ago> Either they decide to intentionally enable it or not. There are no accidents , when stuff like this needs to go through a committee of people for approval before it makes it into production. Absolutely. And all of them decided to screw largely defenseless non-technical consumer to make short-term profits. That's not a fantasy, that's our reality.
- Rinzler89 2y agoYeah, but like I said, that's by intention, not by accident. How does your comment disprove my point which is exactly yours?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- dv_dt 2y agoOr by intent - it seems I was reading about an early proof of concept attack that turned Recall on and hid a systray indicator that it was on.
- ragnese 2y ago"accidentally"