4 ms·
Is this at all related to the major migration from Postgres to MySQL? Previously discussed on HN (294 comments): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12166585
by tiffanyh 2y ago
Is this at all related to the major migration from Postgres to MySQL?
Previously discussed on HN (294 comments):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12166585 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12166585
- dmoy 2y agoYea, seems like a continuation of the same fundamental problem? I don't know. As a commenter there put it - """The actual summary of the article is "The design of Postgres means that updating existing rows is inefficient compared to MySQL".""" I think this is yet another approach to dealing with the cost of updating rows?
- wordofx 2y agoThe reality is they had no idea what they were doing when they built Uber and made some insanely poor choices which they blamed on PostgreSQL.