3 ms·
My preference is common nouns, generally it's the most concise and precise naming, I understand the issue in Go however, so the argument carries weight. What I
by mutatio 2y ago
My preference is common nouns, generally it's the most concise and precise naming, I understand the issue in Go however, so the argument carries weight. What I would say is redundant verbosity is a fair halfway house.
Namespacing in languages such as Rust (modules) are probably most favourable to me, i.e. f64::min/max ~ u64::min/max or a hypothetical crypto::rand() math::rand().