3 ms·
>Yet the bread and butter of universities are their undergraduate students, I'm not sure that's actually true. It's not financially--at least in the short term
by ghaff 2y ago
>Yet the bread and butter of universities are their undergraduate students,
I'm not sure that's actually true. It's not financially--at least in the short term.
There are more smallish teaching-oriented liberal arts colleges/universities but most of the big engineering/science schools probably regard undergrads as largely necessary annoyances if the powers that be were being honest.
For better or worse, the overall trend is for a lot of the smaller liberal arts colleges to be going out of business as home economics/finishing schools really aren't especially useful any longer.
- s_dev 2y ago>big engineering/science schools probably regard undergrads as largely necessary annoyances I recall one definition of a school including elementary right up to University being an institution that passed knowledge from one generation to the next. The suggestion that students are considered an 'annoyance' really is quite galling in itself. It defeats the entire purpose of the institutions and questions why we justify giving them tax money.
- analog31 2y agoI think that if we focus on properly funded public higher education, then it could have a more openly defined mission and the private schools could go back to being mostly seminaries, or just do whatever they want.
- ghaff 2y agoIn the US, there is already a wide range of state schools, community colleges, and trade-oriented educational options. (And private universities largely do what they want within legal and financial limits anyway.) I suppose you can always argue that higher ed/trade-oriented training should have even less expensive options but it's mostly private ed in majors that don't really translate to job opportunities that lead to complaints about the price tag.
- the__alchemist 2y ago> For better or worse, the overall trend is for a lot of the smaller liberal arts colleges to be going out of business as home economics/finishing schools really aren't especially useful any longer. I doubt this. Having an undergraduate degree vice not is a major social status symbol, at least in the US. Someone with a degree from a liberal arts school is much more hirable/datable etc than someone without.
- ghaff 2y agoNot making a judgment. Just an observation that a lot of smaller liberal arts colleges have been closing. Whether or not hiring college grads is overall a good heuristic, it's probably just one that companies apply for a bunch of reasons--whether those reasons are generally valid or not.
- the__alchemist 2y agoI'm with you, and it's interesting to hear they have been closing. I'm curious how the societal changes will shape out if this is true and continues. My observation is that a significant portion of the middle class people I know have liberal arts degrees, or otherwise schools from non-research universities. They date or are married exclusively to other people with degrees, and work at jobs that wouldn't have hired them without degrees. So, those expectations would have to change to, or something similar.
- ghaff 2y agoIn general, I imagine that the big state university systems are the bulk of the grads anyway though I'd have to look at the actual numbers. But, yes, a college degree is a basic heuristic in a lot of cases. There are exceptions but it's often a default.