3 ms·
It was never about "low quality" it had to be viable. That meant it did a thing better than the competition or current solution. What it meant was that you wer
by KaiserPro 2y ago
It was never about "low quality" it had to be viable. That meant it did a thing better than the competition or current solution.
What it meant was that you were allowed to not have features, or required someone to guide a user when they first used it.
Also Viable is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.
Viable for a some internal tool is wildly different to a product released by a large company.