2 ms·
I replaced Gimp with Krita. It is often said that Krita is made for digital painting rather than photo editing but I haven't missed any features so far.
by Lariscus 2y ago
I replaced Gimp with Krita. It is often said that Krita is made for digital painting rather than photo editing but I haven't missed any features so far.
- Aerroon 2y agoFrom my experience Krita didn't feel much better than GIMP. Stuff like the eraser being hidden under brushes is just weird compared to my previous experience.
- hellcow 2y agoIf you're doing digital painting, it's probably just what you're used to. I disliked Krita until I spent a few weeks learning it. Once I found the "Krita way" of doing things, it was actually a much better experience than Photoshop offered for digital painting. I'd recommend finding a YouTube video where an artist takes you through how they use Krita to see some of the workflow and most common shortcuts.
- raverbashing 2y agoKrita is made for artists, not as a demo of a widget library (I'm half serious)
- Aissen 2y agoIt's the other way around. The widget library was built for Gimp, then took a life of its own. Note that Gimp still has not released a version ported to GTK 3 (but the port is done since last year, in the 3.0 branch), released 13 years ago. GTK 4 has been released 4 years ago.