The alignment they’ve put in seems very weak. Very minor variations in the way you ask (i.e. not intentionally attempting to bypass the alignment) can result in

The alignment they’ve put in seems very weak. Very minor variations in the way you ask (i.e. not intentionally attempting to bypass the alignment) can result in it saying that it can’t comment on political topics; that a massacre happened; that controversial protests happened with loss of life; descriptions of how the Chinese government and the west disagree on how it is characterised; or that the Chinese government censors the topic. Sometimes a mixture; for instance it will sometimes tell you in a single response that there was a massacre by the Chinese government, that the Chinese government censors the information, and that the rest of the world sees it differently. If the goal was to censor the topic, they’ve done a bad job. Seems more likely to me they put in minimal effort to pay lip service to the rules.