4 ms·
> The issue of course being that when there is a population crunch, there is no ‘rest of societies labor’ free, like there would be with a normal population age
by tivert 2y ago
> The issue of course being that when there is a population crunch, there is no ‘rest of societies labor’ free, like there would be with a normal population age curve.
Yeah. For that reason, old age pensions should be tied to how many kids you've had, not how much money you paid into the system during your working years. If you have no kids, you get no pension. If you want to support in old age, you need to contribute to the next generation's labor pool to provide that support. Otherwise, you need to work to support yourself.
- lazide 2y agoHah, and I thought ‘forced natalism’ was the controversial one! Or, the more subtle approach - inflation. Hmm, wait a minute….