4 ms·

Adobe responds to vocal uproar over new Terms of Service language

• deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
• fwn 2y ago
  > Adobe accesses user content for a number of reasons, including [...] innovative cloud-based features [...] and to take action against prohibited content. Forcing customers to pseudo-consent to their data being used to train AI is bad enough. You do not have to wrap it in CSAM detection, which, as a spin, is a whole new level of distasteful. If you're a corporate PR person and you're about to respond something like this, it might be better not to respond at all.
  • martinbaun 2y ago
    pseudo-consent or black mailing? It really seems like black mailing at this point.