4 ms·

That's the price of getting an image that accurately represents what you had in mind. Otherwise you could just prompt it with "skateboarder in a skatepark".

by esafak 2y ago

Jackson__ 2y ago
>In the heart of a vibrant skatepark, Vibrant? It's made of white concrete. >a skateboarder is caught in a moment of pure exhilaration. Oh, great we're mind-reading from pictures now? His face isn't even visible. > adding balance to the daring stunt. What incredible commentary. >palm trees sway gently, adding a touch of nature to the urban setting. The trees aren't swaying. But because sometimes trees sway, I guess it'll just say it. > A few spectators can be seen in the distance, their attention riveted on the airborne skateboarder The spectators look more like they are just glancing over, nowhere near "riveted". > The image captures not just a moment, but a story of skill, courage, and the joy of skateboarding. This adds literally nothing.
- zimpenfish 2y ago
  > Vibrant? It's made of white concrete. "vibrant" could apply to the activity, not the physical structure. There's 4 other people in the back of the photo - if you assumed it was a tiny slice of the park, you could say it was vibrant. (to me it doesn't look particularly vibrant re: activity but this is just one small corner and I will allow the ML some leeway in its floridity.)
  - natch 2y ago
    The paragraph said it is the heart of the park, not a "tiny slice." If you're going to praise the paragraph, at least choose a word that's defensible. Like ok, it got "the" right. Surprising that you would defend that particular word. Far from being vibrant, the place looks dead, frankly. You can see it in the bored faces of the three people staring off in random directions with disinterested stances. Even the guy who's walking looks like he's just shuffling along. "I can see how, if you look at it in just the right light, you might think there is a little blue in there." Nah. Not good enough.
darby_nine 2y ago
It doesn't accurately represent the photo, hence the issue at hand. In many ways "skateboarder in a park" is more accurate than the large number of small inaccuracies this description manages to accrue. (Like many humans, but still the verbosity is very odd for the little detail it actually conveys!) I'm not trying to argue against the idea of ai-generated titling, just that the product is very inferior to what even mild diletantes of the field might expect from advertised capabilities.
jebarker 2y ago
This isn't a text to image model it's an image captioning model. The images in the figures are confusingly labeled since it's the caption that's generated, not the image I think.

That's the price of getting an image that accurately represents what you had in mind. Otherwise you could just prompt it with "skateboarder in a skatepark".

by esafak 2y ago

That's the price of getting an image that accurately represents what you had in mind. Otherwise you could just prompt it with "skateboarder in a skatepark".

Jackson__ 2y ago

>In the heart of a vibrant skatepark, Vibrant? It's made of white concrete. >a skateboarder is caught in a moment of pure exhilaration. Oh, great we're mind-reading from pictures now? His face isn't even visible. > adding balance to the daring stunt. What incredible commentary. >palm trees sway gently, adding a touch of nature to the urban setting. The trees aren't swaying. But because sometimes trees sway, I guess it'll just say it. > A few spectators can be seen in the distance, their attention riveted on the airborne skateboarder The spectators look more like they are just glancing over, nowhere near "riveted". > The image captures not just a moment, but a story of skill, courage, and the joy of skateboarding. This adds literally nothing.

zimpenfish 2y ago
> Vibrant? It's made of white concrete. "vibrant" could apply to the activity, not the physical structure. There's 4 other people in the back of the photo - if you assumed it was a tiny slice of the park, you could say it was vibrant. (to me it doesn't look particularly vibrant re: activity but this is just one small corner and I will allow the ML some leeway in its floridity.)
- natch 2y ago
  The paragraph said it is the heart of the park, not a "tiny slice." If you're going to praise the paragraph, at least choose a word that's defensible. Like ok, it got "the" right. Surprising that you would defend that particular word. Far from being vibrant, the place looks dead, frankly. You can see it in the bored faces of the three people staring off in random directions with disinterested stances. Even the guy who's walking looks like he's just shuffling along. "I can see how, if you look at it in just the right light, you might think there is a little blue in there." Nah. Not good enough.

darby_nine 2y ago

It doesn't accurately represent the photo, hence the issue at hand. In many ways "skateboarder in a park" is more accurate than the large number of small inaccuracies this description manages to accrue. (Like many humans, but still the verbosity is very odd for the little detail it actually conveys!) I'm not trying to argue against the idea of ai-generated titling, just that the product is very inferior to what even mild diletantes of the field might expect from advertised capabilities.

jebarker 2y ago

This isn't a text to image model it's an image captioning model. The images in the figures are confusingly labeled since it's the caption that's generated, not the image I think.