>When you propose that a conspiracy happened, you propose that the purpose of something was different from the stated purpose. Yes, but this doesn't mean that

>When you propose that a conspiracy happened, you propose that the purpose of something was different from the stated purpose. Yes, but this doesn't mean that you know the actual purpose. >So what purpose were you proposing? I'm not proposing anything; I didn't propose a conspiracy happened, the OP did. I'm just explaining that the conspiracy theorist doesn't have to allege a specific purpose. As for the curfews, my theory is that it was just plain anti-science stupidity, plus wanting to look like they're doing something, like many political decisions. If you disagree, please explain how someone riding a bicycle outdoors in a rural area with no other humans around somehow spreads a virus. Only countries with truly stupid leadership even had restrictions like these (i.e., UK, they're the only one I know of actually).