The GDPR has many more articles. The decision https://www.rechtbanken-tribunaux.be/sites/default/files/media/hbca/gent/files/uittreksel-inhoud-arrest-03.06.2024

The GDPR has many more articles. The decision https://www.rechtbanken-tribunaux.be/sites/default/files/media/hbca/gent/files/uittreksel-inhoud-arrest-03.06.2024-hof-van-beroep-gent-k-7.pdf https://www.rechtbanken-tribunaux.be/sites/default/files/med... cites Article 22 https://gdpr-info.eu/art-22-gdpr/ https://gdpr-info.eu/art-22-gdpr/ concerning automated decision-making, which grants "the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision." It also cites Article 13 https://gdpr-info.eu/art-13-gdpr/ https://gdpr-info.eu/art-13-gdpr/ and 14 https://gdpr-info.eu/art-14-gdpr/ https://gdpr-info.eu/art-14-gdpr/ concerning the right to information. AFAICT (my Dutch is not the best) Meta did not properly inform the plaintiff about the shadowban and didn't properly give him the opportunity to contest the decision.