3 ms·

> Interesting. I didn't see any examples to support that. The example given in the article seems like unnecessary police contact. I'm unsure where the confusio

> Interesting. I didn't see any examples to support that. The example given in the article seems like unnecessary police contact. I'm unsure where the confusion lies - the entire point of the original post is about the intent of the technology not aligning with its usage. Clearly the intent is clearly stated and aligns with what the original comment said. That's just one example as well? I'm not really sure what your point is here.

giantg2 2y ago
"IF it can be used for its intended purpose" My original comment was saying it seems it's not used for it's intended purpose based on contact still being made. Then you replied with an article quote from the police about their stated intention. Why, I'm not sure. It seems we're in agreement that the actual usage and intended usage differ.