Academics have gotten AI wrong since its inception and now are relegated to the trailing edges of the field. Mostly because increasingly insist on theory-as-fac

Academics have gotten AI wrong since its inception and now are relegated to the trailing edges of the field. Mostly because increasingly insist on theory-as-fact in soft arenas that are clearly still in motion. Reasoning has been one thing, it can continue to grow to be another. But even from your defition, I can provide abductive, inductive, and other examples of it reasoning to this degree just fine. However tour examples are a bit... silly to be honest. But keep lecturing everyone -- its very common for post-grads to be so up their own behind in their research that they've closed their world off until they are the only ones right in it.