This won't save time for people if you think about it. What it does mean is that you defer the meeting results to a time that they can be read, instead of defe

This won't save time for people if you think about it. What it does mean is that you defer the meeting results to a time that they can be read, instead of deferring the work you would have done attending the meeting. So there's no less work there... Then the realisation hits that the LLM made a wrong choice, for example you realise others in a meeting had a better idea but your LLM misrepresented yours. Then you have to arrange another meeting to fix the result of the last meeting, but have to do it in person, not only that but you have to do it urgently to stop others proceeding with the original outcome... So the time you possibly save from good AI meetings is quite likely to be supplanted by the bad meeting outcomes' time loss.