Interesting information, thanks! > The argument used to refute this is usually that people aren’t doing agile right and if only the people and companies were m

Interesting information, thanks! > The argument used to refute this is usually that people aren’t doing agile right and if only the people and companies were more competent and or did MORE Agile then things would be fine. > Generally speaking successful tech companies don’t often put unskilled dispassionate middle managers in charge of software projects and don’t often use Agile processes But do you think this problem is inherent to the agile process itself? We (as in "more technical department") manage to get our things done on time and budget with the same external agency. It might be due to us formulating clear expectations and behaviours and iterating over improvements, but I'd say this whole process of "lots of little steps" works fine for us. On the other hand, when I think about it right now, we might be doing fine with a more traditional project management process too, because we are able to set expectations... Hm... not sure...